Historical proposal, obsoleted by
ListWorkPolicy.
Gaba' proposal
Something else to chew on... i wrote this some time ago intending to
finish it with some more stuff, but I never got around to it...
What this email contains:
- Background
- Listwork today
- What needs to be done
* Proposal
Background
In San Fransisco many IMC people (majority of which were from the
U.S.) met. I wanted to make it clear there that the method of
operation that the tech team had been working under (as a growth of
the rapid onslaught of demand and turn-around time) had been growing
into a power structure that was unacceptable to the overall
organization's (meaning the IMC) core. At that time things got done
because certain people had access and certain people knew who to go to
in order to get something done, it was a who you know sort of thing,
instead of a sustainable process of involvement and transparancy. It
was also the tech team making network-wide non-tech decisions. The
message was heard and many of the decisions that the tech team had
been making, have been organically growing into solid working groups
(such as the new-imc working group). However, it is still true that a
lot of the technical work gets done through the who-you-know system
(which is really akin to the old-boys network), but this is changing.
Listwork today
Currently listwork is a functioning and healthy technical working
group within the IMC network. There are some awesome people dedicated
to making this piece of the IMC work. There is a process (granted, it
is crude, but it is more advanced than many others) for some aspects,
namely: How do you create a list? (
http://newlist.indymedia.org), How
do you get help with list related problems? (mail listwork). Little
process is better than lots of process in my mind, because process can
be crippling and beauracratic. That is not what we want, and if we
ever get to that stage a revolution is required (revolution here is
really just returning to what is important, reanalyzing what we are
trying to do and evaluating our processes and our organization from
the standpoint of our core values).
What needs to be done
In my mind, some simple processes and procedures need to be hashed
out. Once these are done, I really believe that the listwork group
will be the strongest working group within the IMC, but will be a
model for other working groups to self-organize.
Proposal
I would like to propose that listwork consider the following issues,
develop simple answers, without worrying about getting things perfect
(as these processes should always be maliable), and adopt them as
policy/procedures.
Defining process
How should proposals be submitted and handled?
Defining access
The listwork team, and a few system admins, have access to the new
mail machine (sarai). It has been requested, and I think it is a valid
request, although it isn't properly approved yet, that the only people
who have access to sarai are those who are part of the listwork
working group. This doesn't mean signing up for the mailing list and
procmailing the list to a folder, never doing anything, this means
active participation in the listwork group. Meaning, helping with list
questions/problems/requests that are network-wide. In order to keep
the rapid creep of root access down I think that this is a good
policy, it doesn't make sense to punch huge holes in network-wide
resource security for things that could simply be requested from a
dedicated, strong working group (ie. listwork).
Defining boundries
- How are new lists requested (done)
- Of these list requests, what lists should be created?
- How is the list creation process done (commands, who does it,
notification that the list has been done)
- What lists should be used for and what they should not be used
for.
- Roles of a list administrator
- What is required
- What to do when you dont want to be a list admin anymore
- Roles of a listworker
- What makes a listworker? (scope, expectations)
- How to become a listworker (volunteer)
- When you no longer can be a listworker
- Emergencies
- Problem notification
- Resolution (ie. how should problems be worked?)
Here i will write some more proposal and try to make on from all of that.
--
JiBe - 12 Mar 2005 Created the page.
to top