back to
PublishingFeatures or
GlobalFeatures
Global Features Discussion page
Recently, there has been some really good discussion about what makes a feature. Take, for example, the
post by anna which raised a concern about the
Hamas feature and started off a recent thread:
- i think we can agree that the situation in the middle east is terrible
and will deteriorate with this attack and that indymedia should cover
it. but i think that indymedia is not the place for the same stories
that we can find in the commercial media?
<snip>
- i tend to think that indymedia should not try to be better that the
mainstream in covering the same issues in the same way. that's not what
we're good at - that is what they are good at. plus that people can
read/watch/listen to the mainstream when they like - i don't think there
are a lot of people in this world who have access to nothing but
indymedia.
- i prefer reporting 'from the streets', from social movements, from
independent journalists, activists.
- i know this sounds simple and often it's not and hard to draw the line.
(apologies - not quite sure how to do quotes in twiki!)
There were a number of responses to this email:
- Bht
- Clara
- Blackbeard
- RetroDame - and max wrote in agreement
- Bht response to Retrodame
Going back further, I recall this similar discussion being had just recently when there was an article posted about postal bombs originating in Bologna, Italy - the thread started with an email by
otted (well, actually began just before that) and continued with contributions from many: check the first part of the
january archives by thread for much more reading!!
--
GarconDuMonde - 30 Mar 2004 - started page