You are here:
(17 Jan 2005,
A place to discuss issues about local relevance for imc oxford. In particular, what criteria do we use to decide a post should stay in the oxford newswire or be hidden from it? Please add details of previous discussions and/or your current thoughts.
Discussion mid-March 2004
hid some posts
including undercurrents ESF thing
undercurrents shouldn't be hid
, they are oxford-based, and reporting on events in which oxford people are involved (ESF)
agree with both
. ESF is important + relevant, but these are empty posts (upload problems), also undercurrents shouldn't assume special treatment.
agree with V
agree with V
, though in this case posts are empty so should be hid
link needs to be obvious
or things get cliquey; what can we do to encourage this?
take O's point
. In practise can be difficult to gauge pre-existing knowledge. importance of good english.
Discussion mid-May 2004
hid GM-related post
S: this is oxford-relevant because
many oxford activists are very involved
in anti-GM campaigns
agree with S
, example of bayer feature. Unhid and added comment to article.
O: that's cool. Just
want oxford link to be made explicit
. Started twiki :O
Discussion mid-January 2005
deselected a couple of posts
- call for films for film festival and Brighton anti-arms trade.
"local site for local people" needs rethinking
- in favour of repeat postings to make imc-uk less over-arching.. and these specific posts are oxford linked.
don't mind if these posts stay up
, but in general if we have national stuff on oxford frontpage I'd like it to be separated from oxford stuff.
- 12 May 2004 created page (
has forgotten his password
iew wiki text
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 17 Jan 2005,
Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki?